page-loading-spinner
by Chris Martenson

A new Martenson Report is ready for subscribers.  In it, I describe the worst and best case scenarios that I see possible in the next few years, highlight China’s concerns, examine the global trade deficit, and conclude that the bottom is not in.

Link to report

You should be cautious in allowing the opinions of experts everywhere – including me – to override your own common sense. Be careful to separate facts from opinions from beliefs. In desperate times, it is normal for the already-murky boundaries between these three elements to blur even further.

While I am agnostic over whether the stock market will bounce upwards for a while or resume on a path towards new lows, I am nearly 100% certain that we’re not done wringing the former excesses and malinvestments out of the system.

New Martenson Report: Where do we go from here?
by Chris Martenson

A new Martenson Report is ready for subscribers.  In it, I describe the worst and best case scenarios that I see possible in the next few years, highlight China’s concerns, examine the global trade deficit, and conclude that the bottom is not in.

Link to report

You should be cautious in allowing the opinions of experts everywhere – including me – to override your own common sense. Be careful to separate facts from opinions from beliefs. In desperate times, it is normal for the already-murky boundaries between these three elements to blur even further.

While I am agnostic over whether the stock market will bounce upwards for a while or resume on a path towards new lows, I am nearly 100% certain that we’re not done wringing the former excesses and malinvestments out of the system.

by Chris Martenson

As I’ve been writing about in the Martenson Reports over time, including the last one, one of the next shoes to drop is going to be a pension disaster. This too will be more easily measured in trillions than billions.

I am expecting a public pension wreck based on “management” so flawed as to cross over into gross negligence or worse.

March 3 (Bloomberg) — The Chicago Transit Authority retirement plan had a $1.5 billion hole in its stash of assets in 2007. At the height of a four-year bull market, it didn’t have enough cash on hand to pay its retirees through 2013, meaning it was underfunded to the tune of 62 percent.

The CTA, which manages the second-largest public transit system in the U.S., had to hope for a huge contribution from the Illinois state legislature. That wasn’t going to happen.

Then the authority found an answer.

“We’ve identified the problem and a solution,” said CTA Chairman Carole Brown on April 16, 2007. The agency decided to raise money from a bond sale.

So far so good, eh? I mean especially if you don’t think about it too hard. After all, the only way a scheme to borrow money to plug a fiscal hole can work is if you are earning more from investing that cash that you are paying out in interest. Makes sense right?

Your investment gains have to exceed your interest costs or the scheme becomes a sure-fire money loser.

Well, here’s the punch line:

The Looming Pension Disaster
by Chris Martenson

As I’ve been writing about in the Martenson Reports over time, including the last one, one of the next shoes to drop is going to be a pension disaster. This too will be more easily measured in trillions than billions.

I am expecting a public pension wreck based on “management” so flawed as to cross over into gross negligence or worse.

March 3 (Bloomberg) — The Chicago Transit Authority retirement plan had a $1.5 billion hole in its stash of assets in 2007. At the height of a four-year bull market, it didn’t have enough cash on hand to pay its retirees through 2013, meaning it was underfunded to the tune of 62 percent.

The CTA, which manages the second-largest public transit system in the U.S., had to hope for a huge contribution from the Illinois state legislature. That wasn’t going to happen.

Then the authority found an answer.

“We’ve identified the problem and a solution,” said CTA Chairman Carole Brown on April 16, 2007. The agency decided to raise money from a bond sale.

So far so good, eh? I mean especially if you don’t think about it too hard. After all, the only way a scheme to borrow money to plug a fiscal hole can work is if you are earning more from investing that cash that you are paying out in interest. Makes sense right?

Your investment gains have to exceed your interest costs or the scheme becomes a sure-fire money loser.

Well, here’s the punch line:

by Chris Martenson

This new Martenson Report is ready for subscribers.

In it, I make the case the the recent action in the stock prices of banks, insurance companies and GE (really a financial company when you get right down to it) speak of a predicament that may be "Too Big to Save".

Too Big to Save

Snippet from the summary:

The summary of all these charts and observations is that pretty much the entire financial universe continues to crumble. This raises the prospect that, collectively, all these companies are "too big to save," no matter what the intentions and hopes of the new administration or this nation. I see several trillions of dollars needed to merely stabilize the situation. But to return it to its former glory? Sorry, not this year, not next year, and maybe not ever.

You need to consider your situation if the financial system suffers further erosion, as the options before our government are few, shrinking, and growing less and less palatable by the day.

Best,
Chris

Too Big to Save – New Martenson Report Ready
by Chris Martenson

This new Martenson Report is ready for subscribers.

In it, I make the case the the recent action in the stock prices of banks, insurance companies and GE (really a financial company when you get right down to it) speak of a predicament that may be "Too Big to Save".

Too Big to Save

Snippet from the summary:

The summary of all these charts and observations is that pretty much the entire financial universe continues to crumble. This raises the prospect that, collectively, all these companies are "too big to save," no matter what the intentions and hopes of the new administration or this nation. I see several trillions of dollars needed to merely stabilize the situation. But to return it to its former glory? Sorry, not this year, not next year, and maybe not ever.

You need to consider your situation if the financial system suffers further erosion, as the options before our government are few, shrinking, and growing less and less palatable by the day.

Best,
Chris

by Chris Martenson
Sunday, March 1, 2009

The latest government budget proposal from the executive branch is out, and it’s a masterpiece of fiscal irresponsibility.  Clocking in at $3.6 trillion, it sports a deficit that is 12.5% of the projected GDP for FY2009 (fiscal year).   It also displays no sacrifice in any quarter, as everything is funded, and then some.  Sure, the priorities shifted between administrations, but a lack of spending limits did not. 

"But this is an emergency!" we are told, implying that it’s not the right time to be pulling in our spending horns.  This argument rests on the assumption that our problems can be fixed through additional deficit spending.  However, the facts suggest that we are suffering from too much debt and too much deficit spending, not the opposite.

Too Big To Save
PREVIEW by Chris Martenson
Sunday, March 1, 2009

The latest government budget proposal from the executive branch is out, and it’s a masterpiece of fiscal irresponsibility.  Clocking in at $3.6 trillion, it sports a deficit that is 12.5% of the projected GDP for FY2009 (fiscal year).   It also displays no sacrifice in any quarter, as everything is funded, and then some.  Sure, the priorities shifted between administrations, but a lack of spending limits did not. 

"But this is an emergency!" we are told, implying that it’s not the right time to be pulling in our spending horns.  This argument rests on the assumption that our problems can be fixed through additional deficit spending.  However, the facts suggest that we are suffering from too much debt and too much deficit spending, not the opposite.

Total 4907 items

Daily Digest

Please login to submit a story to the Daily Digest.

View Past Daily Digests