Executive Summary
- Why revolutions start in the middle-class
- How social disorder and new narratives are critical ingredients to regime change
- How the central State will react to being challenged
- Why the inevitable outcome of class conflict is an increasingly unstable social/economic order
If you have not yet read How The Seeds Of Revolution Take Root, available free to all readers, please click here to read it first.
In Part 1, we surveyed three conventional models the sources of social disorder/revolution and focused on the under-appreciated model of suppressed social mobility.
In Part 2, we examine the other half of this dynamic: the systemic misalignment of aspirations and opportunities.
The Wellspring of Revolution: An Aspirational Middle Class
One of the great ironies of Marx's historical blueprint for revolution is that revolutionary leaders don't arise from the peasantry or proletariat as he anticipated but from a middle class with aspirations and expectations that are unfulfilled by the status quo–in other words, a society with low social mobility.
Marx was born into a wealthy middle-class family in Trier in the Prussian Rhineland (now Germany), and studied at the universities of Bonn and Berlin at a time when only the elite attended university.
Lenin was born into a wealthy middle-class family in Simbirsk, Russia. His interest in revolutionary socialist politics was sparked by his brother's execution in 1887. He was expelled from Kazan State University for participating in protests.
Mao Zedong was the son of a wealthy farmer in Shaoshan, Hunan.